The housing affordability crisis is set to become a central issue in the 2024 election.
Housing affordability has become a significant challenge in the United States, particularly for first-time buyers. The ongoing high cost of living and escalating interest rates in the first few years of this decade have dramatically increased the obstacles faced by potential homeowners.
The Federal Reserve’s efforts to tackle inflation through substantial interest rate hikes have fundamentally reshaped the housing market. As a result, many individuals struggle to attain homeownership. The limited availability of homes combined with mortgage rates at their highest in years has exacerbated the crisis as home prices continue to rise.
And, with a political storm brewing, the housing crisis is taking center stage in the upcoming elections. As mortgage rates reach historical peaks, the connection between economic policy and personal financial stress becomes more evident. This scenario has ignited public demand for effective solutions to tackle the escalating crisis.
Interest Rates Strain Housing Affordability
Interest rates significantly influence the housing market. As the Federal Reserve raises rates to combat inflation, the impact on home affordability has been substantial.
Currently, the average mortgage rate stands at approximately 7.79%, a stark contrast to the 2.65% rate observed at the beginning of 2021. This increase has resulted in soaring monthly payments for prospective homeowners, who now confront a daunting reality when considering homeownership.
Mike McCann, a senior economist at Realtor, notes that the inventory of available homes has drastically declined, as many homeowners remain locked into favorable mortgage rates and are hesitant to sell their properties, creating a bottleneck in the market.
Data reveals a staggering drop in the turnover rate of homes, with only 2.5% changing hands in the first eight months of 2024, according to a new Redfin report. This marks the lowest turnover in at least three decades.
This stagnation reflects the broader challenges faced by potential buyers. High prices deter prospective homeowners and diminish their purchasing power due to increased rates, particularly since higher interest rates lead to larger monthly mortgage payments, making homeownership feel unattainable for many.
This process cultivates an environment where, despite falling sales numbers, home prices remain relatively stable, as demand continues to exceed the limited supply.
In addition, the Fed’s recent decision to cut interest rates for the first time since March 2020 may not provide immediate relief. Economists predict that while lower rates could eventually stimulate demand, they might also lead to higher home prices.
“With mortgage rates falling to 24-month lows and a high probability of further rate reductions, there is a significant chance that the rate of home price growth will bottom out over the next months and then reaccelerate at the end of the year or at the beginning of next year as the purchasing power of homebuyers begins to reflect a more favorable rate environment,” Forbes reported, citing McLaughlin.
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell warned that easing monetary policy does not ensure improved affordability. Instead, he emphasized the fundamental issue: a critical shortage of housing supply.
Current data from Zillow indicates that the US faces a housing shortfall of approximately 4.5 million homes. However, as housing prices continue to surge, many prospective buyers feel disillusioned, struggling to navigate a market that increasingly appears out of reach.
The challenge lies not only in securing affordable financing but also in locating available homes that meet their needs. The historical context of homeownership, once viewed by many Americans as part of the American Dream, has transformed into a more daunting aspiration for countless individuals and families.
Structural Flaws Expose Housing Policy Failures
Structural flaws within housing policy have significantly worsened the crisis.
For decades, underinvestment in housing infrastructure, combined with restrictive zoning laws, has created an environment where demand far exceeds supply. Consequently, these systemic issues have led to a housing market that is unresponsive, with new construction failing to keep pace with population growth and changing demographics.
In many urban areas, zoning regulations limit the types and densities of housing that can be developed. Often, these laws favor single-family homes over multi-family options. This approach not only restricts housing supply but also contributes to rising prices in desirable neighborhoods. Furthermore, the failure to adapt to the evolving needs of a growing population highlights a critical policy shortcoming.
According to the 2021 American Housing Survey, despite improvements in building codes and construction standards, the number of U.S. households living in substandard homes has remained largely unchanged over the past two decades.
In 2021, 2.8 million homeowner households and 3.9 million renter households were reported to be living in moderately or severely inadequate housing. While the number of homeowner households in inadequate conditions decreased by 147,000 over these twenty years, the number of renter households facing structural deficiencies increased by 354,000. In total, 6.7 million households were found to be living in inadequate housing, reflecting a rise of 206,000 since 2001.
In this context, economists stress that significant reforms are crucial to address these shortcomings. Policymakers must prioritize accessibility and affordability to ensure housing becomes attainable for a broader range of individuals.
Moreover, initiatives designed to stimulate housing construction often miss their intended targets. Recent proposals from political leaders, such as tax incentives for builders and efforts to minimize regulatory hurdles, reflect a growing acknowledgment of the urgent need for action.
In her presidential campaign, Vice President Kamala Harris has expressed her commitment to tackling housing affordability through government action. She has highlighted proposals like tax incentives for builders and reducing regulatory obstacles, signaling a proactive approach to the housing crisis.
Harris’s agenda aligns with many of President Joe Biden’s initiatives, which emphasize tax credits for middle-class families and lowering drug costs. However, she has articulated her unique vision, distinguishing her platform from previous left-leaning positions, such as support for single-payer health care.
As Harris seeks to navigate public perception regarding the current administration, she aims to propose economic measures that require congressional backing while remaining somewhat vague about the financial implications of her plans.
In her vision for America, Harris contrasts her forward-looking agenda with the past policies of former President Donald Trump, asserting the importance of her leadership in shaping the nation’s future.
However, without addressing the underlying supply issues and creating incentives for building affordable housing, these efforts may prove inadequate. The debate surrounding housing policy has become increasingly politicized, with differing approaches to the crisis reflected in campaign platforms as elections approach.
As the political landscape evolves, candidates must present a clear and actionable vision for housing policy. With a significant portion of the electorate concerned about rising housing costs, directly addressing these issues will be crucial in the upcoming elections.
Ultimately, the success of any proposed solutions will depend on a collaborative effort among federal, state, and local governments to reshape the housing landscape for future generations.
Housing Crisis Becomes Election Flashpoint
As the housing crisis deepens, it has emerged as a central issue in the upcoming elections. Candidates from both parties recognize that housing affordability resonates strongly with voters.
Recent polls indicate that 84% of voters in swing states consider housing costs a critical concern, making it a pivotal topic for candidates seeking support. For Democrats, effectively addressing this crisis is essential to maintain voter confidence amid ongoing worries about inflation and rising living expenses.
In response, proposals aimed at enhancing housing access have taken center stage in campaign platforms. Vice President Kamala Harris’s recent initiative to offer tax credits for first-time homebuyers underscores the urgency of tackling affordability challenges.
Harris’s proposals are estimated to raise approximately $1.7 trillion in taxes over ten years after accounting for credits and cuts; however, considering slower economic growth, the net increase is projected to be around $642 billion. This could potentially lead to a long-term reduction in GDP by 2.0%, capital stock by 3.0%, wages by 1.2%, and employment by approximately 786,000 full-time equivalent jobs.
Harris’s plan aims to stimulate homeownership while addressing broader supply issues. The commitment to develop three million new homes over the next four years reflects an acknowledgment of the systemic problems plaguing the housing market. However, the success of these plans depends on effective implementation and political determination to confront longstanding vested interests.
Republican candidates have also prioritized housing in their platforms. Proposals to expand construction on federal lands and provide tax relief for first-time buyers showcase a bipartisan recognition of the issue. Yet, many voters remain skeptical about the effectiveness of these measures, viewing them as inadequate given the severity of the crisis.
During a recent vice-presidential debate, JD Vance and Tim Walz clashed over the U.S. housing crisis, presenting starkly different views on its causes. Vance argued that undocumented immigrants increase competition for housing, driving up costs, and advocated for mass deportation as a potential solution.
Conversely, Walz attributed the crisis to a lack of affordable housing and proposed government-led construction as a remedy. Economists largely dismiss Vance’s claim, pointing to rising interest rates and pandemic-related trends as the primary catalysts for housing price surges since 2020.
Chris Herbert, managing director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies, argues that while immigrants contribute to overall housing demand, they should not be blamed for the recent spikes in home prices and rents. He noted that low immigration levels during the pandemic coincided with price surges, and housing costs began to stabilize as immigration increased in 2022 and 2023.
“While immigrants do add to overall housing demand, they cannot be blamed for the recent surge in home prices and rents that took off in 2020 and 2021, as immigration reached its lowest levels in decades due to the pandemic,” Herbert said.
Similarly, Ernie Tedeschi, a former chief economist for President Joe Biden, sees no clear correlation between the growth of the foreign-born population and rising home prices among native-born citizens.
The housing crisis is poised to be a defining issue in the 2024 presidential election, with candidates proposing differing strategies to tackle it. Kamala Harris has pledged to build three million homes in four years and implement new tax credits for buyers, but some voters question the feasibility of these promises.
Economics and public sentiment suggest that the path forward will require bipartisan cooperation. As candidates take to the campaign trail, their ability to address the housing crisis effectively could determine their electoral fate and the future of housing affordability in the United States.
Fed’s Limited Role in Solving the Crisis
The Federal Reserve’s ability to influence the housing market is inherently limited, despite its significant role in shaping broader economic conditions. While the Fed can adjust interest rates to stabilize inflation, it cannot address the root causes of the housing crisis.
During a press conference on September 18, Jerome Powell highlighted the limitations of monetary policy in confronting the housing crisis, emphasizing that the core issue stems from a persistent shortage of housing, rather than being solely a function of monetary policy. He elaborated on the complexities of the housing market, citing the “lock-in effect,” which occurs when homeowners with low mortgage rates hesitate to sell.
Although Powell noted that a reduction in interest rates might encourage some market activity, he stressed that the fundamental problem remains an insufficient supply of housing. He stated, “The real issue with housing is that we have had, and are on track to continue to have, not enough housing…this is not something the Fed can really fix.”
While the Fed’s rate cuts may have an indirect effect on long-term rates, the primary constraints on housing activity—particularly in terms of affordability and supply—demand coordinated actions from both market players and government authorities. Powell’s remarks underscore the uncertainty surrounding the housing market’s response to these policy changes.
Despite the Fed’s recent rate cut aimed at reducing borrowing costs, the anticipated impacts on home prices remain uncertain. Lower rates could potentially bolster demand, exacerbating price increases in a market already strained by limited inventory.
The complexities of the housing market make it challenging to predict how shifts in monetary policy will translate into real-world outcomes. Powell’s assertion that “this is not something the Fed can really fix” reinforces the necessity for a multifaceted approach to address the housing crisis.
In practical terms, the Fed’s primary role is to create a stable economic environment that facilitates growth. By normalizing interest rates, the central bank aims to foster a more balanced housing market. However, as Powell indicated, resolving the underlying supply issues requires concerted efforts from both market participants and government entities.
So, the focus must extend toward solutions beyond monetary policy. Furthermore, a comprehensive housing strategy that encompasses zoning reform, increased funding for affordable housing initiatives, and innovative financing solutions will be pivotal for achieving long-term sustainability.
Housing Crisis Deepens Socioeconomic Inequality
The housing crisis significantly exacerbates socioeconomic inequality in the United States. As home prices soar and affordability remains elusive, marginalized communities face mounting challenges in securing stable housing. The inability to access affordable housing not only hampers individual wealth accumulation but also intensifies existing disparities within society. A major barrier to homeownership is the escalating cost of entry into the market, which disproportionately affects low-income families and individuals.
Data from the National Low Income Housing Coalition underscores this disparity, revealing that individuals in swing states experience considerable difficulties affording basic housing. Specifically, they require nearly double the median annual income to secure adequate housing.
According to a March report [nlihc.org pdf] from the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the U.S. grapples with a severe shortage of 7.3 million rental homes that are affordable and available for renters with extremely low incomes—those earning at or below the federal poverty guideline or 30% of their area’s median income.
On average, there are only 34 affordable rental homes for every 100 extremely low-income renter households. This shortage affects all states and major metropolitan areas, with Nevada exhibiting the least availability at just 14 homes per 100 households, while South Dakota has the most at 57.
Moreover, in 12 of the 50 largest metropolitan areas, the absolute shortage exceeds 100,000 affordable units, significantly exacerbating the challenges faced by extremely low-income renters nationwide.
The economic ramifications of this crisis extend beyond individual homeowners; communities often grapple with the consequences of stagnant growth and deteriorating living conditions. Without access to affordable housing, families are forced to allocate funds toward rent, leaving less available for education, healthcare, and other essential services.
A June report by the National Low Income Housing Coalition indicates that low-income families disproportionately face food insecurity due to high housing costs, limiting their ability to afford nutritious food. Low-income neighborhoods frequently lack access to affordable grocery stores, exacerbating health risks.
Moreover, women struggling to keep up with housing payments are particularly affected, with nearly two in five experiencing food insufficiency. This trend is more pronounced among disabled women of color and LGBTQIA+ adults, where over half report food insecurity. In 2021, severely cost-burdened households spent 39% less on food compared to their unburdened counterparts. The impact is felt across demographics, as women—especially those with children—often prioritize their children’s meals over their own.
And systemic inequities in housing access also create a cycle of disadvantage that is challenging to break. Discriminatory practices in lending and housing policies have historically marginalized specific groups, perpetuating patterns of exclusion. As interest rates rise and home prices continue to escalate, these issues compound, leading to a significant increase in homelessness and housing instability.
A recent report projects that U.S. home prices will rise by 4.5% this year and 4.4% in 2025, fueled by anticipated Federal Reserve interest rate cuts amidst a resilient economy. Analysts at Goldman Sachs attribute this revised outlook to improving labor markets, which provide more room to lower rates without significantly impacting homebuyers’ purchasing power. Despite current affordability challenges—reported to be the worst since the early 1980s—the demand for housing remains strong, driven by household formation among individuals aged 30 to 39.
Although the rapid rise in prices has created significant barriers, the forecast suggests that a gradual decrease in interest rates and positive income growth will stabilize housing affordability over the next five years.
Despite regional disparities, areas in the Midwest, Northeast, and California are expected to experience significant home price growth, while Florida faces challenges due to declining income growth and escalating insurance costs, making it one of the least affordable markets in the country.
It is evident that addressing these inequalities has become increasingly important. Comprehensive housing policies must prioritize equity to ensure that all individuals have access to safe and affordable housing. Political commitment to tackling systemic issues is crucial for building a more just society. Furthermore, recognizing that the housing crisis impacts not only individual households but also the overall fabric of communities and the nation is essential.
[Disclaimer: This article may contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on a link and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend products and services that we believe will add value to our readers. Your support helps us continue to provide high-quality content. Thank you for your understanding!]
